social conflict in psychology


The first is ego defensiveness. If both decide to buy missiles, famine continues to exist and the conflict lingers on—this is better for both A and B than losing the conflict and therefore a relatively attractive outcome.

Or consider guilt and shame, which communicate that one has taken or received more than deserved. It is a social relationship wherein action is intentionally oriented to carry out the actor's own will despite the resistance of others. In such situations, Party A (the wife) demands and Party B (the husband) withdraws, so that the A demands with greater persistence and perseverance, whereupon B withdraws even further, and so on.

Although anger sometimes evokes anger (“Who do you think you are! The basic idea is that parties have high or low aspirations and, independently, a high or low concern for their counterpart’s interests. The most powerful tendency is to reciprocate one’s counterpart’s behavior. This insight formed the basis of ongoing research into intergroup relations and conflict resolution through the development of shared goals and social identity.A second important source of inspiration formed the (changing) labor relations in the late 1950s and early 1960s of the past century. Whereas an infinite number of conflict tactics and strategies may be conceived of, conflict research and theory tends to converge on the idea that parties to a conflict can (1) ask for third party intervention (i.e., ask a judge, an arbitrator, their manager, or fate to make a decision); (2) engage in unilateral decision making by trying to impose one’s will on the other side (forcing), by accepting and incorporating the other’s will (yielding), or by withdrawing from the situation or by remaining inactive (avoiding); or (3) engage in joint decision making (i.e., seek a compromise, engage in problem solving, try negotiation, ask a mediator for help). Thus, concern for the other may be rooted in genuinely prosocial motives or in enlightened self-interest (i.e., by helping the other one serve one’s own best interests).When aspiration motivation is high and the concern for other is low, parties engage in forcing, that is, attempting to impose their goals upon the other party. However, even when one is not greedy and basically inclined to cooperate, the desire not to be exploited requires one to match the other’s competitiveness.Sometimes disputants perform complementary reactions. Social conflict is the struggle for agency or power in society.

Conflict theory is seen throughout relationships and interactions between two groups of people including races, opposite sexes, and religions. In negotiation, making lots of concessions may lead one’s counterpart to stop making concessions and to wait for you to come down even further (a strategy called mismatching). Then begins an era of social revolution. Karl Marx, a German revolutionary, emphasized his materialist views on ownership and means of production. Concern for the other is high when realizing the other’s interests is positively valued (e.g., one likes the other), instrumental (e.g., one needs one’s counterpart in future interaction, for example at work), and feasible. Another occurrence is exploitation; when workers receive less money than what their labour is worth. This happens when one party desires change, whereas the counterpart desires to maintain the status quo (e.g., a traditional husband who refuses to do household chores facing his liberated wife who wants him to do an equal share). "Pruitt, Dean G., Kim, Sung Hee, Eds., (2004, 3rd Edition) Social Conflict, Escalation and Settlement, McGraw Hill Higher Education, New York, NY

Letizia Ramolino Job, Amanda Caldwell Bachelor, Daniel Tompkins Age, Normani Kordei Best Dance Breaks, Daniel Tompkins Age, Bobina En Inglés, Mid America Bank, Florida Quarter 2004, Canon 1300d Amazon, Brahman In Hindi,

social conflict in psychologyLeave a Reply